Đánh giá sony a6000+ len 18-105
|
Sorry, we just need to make sure you're not a robot. For best results, please make sure your browser is accepting cookies. Type the characters you see in this image:Try different image Conditions of Use Privacy Policy © 1996-2014, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates I already got a Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN and Sony SEL35F18. I mostly use it for my travel, not sure if I should get the zoom lens and sell away my 35mm. I like the quality of prime lens but also want the flexibility of not changing the lens so often. Need some advice from all of you! ANSWER: This question has not been answered yet. Htbaa • Senior Member • Posts: 1,051 Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? In reply to ChrisJ90 • Sep 5, 2019 1 ChrisJ90 wrote: I really like mine. But it's no low light wonder, your Sigma 16mm and Sony 35mm will do better in that regard. I've got a bunch of lenses, but my main lenses are the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 and the Sony 18-105 f/4 G. If you like the Sony 35mm and don't have to sell it to get additional funds, then keep it. It's pretty big though. Also something you should remember it being a power zoom it'll reset to 18mm when you turn the camera off. Not an issue for me, but some might find it annoying. The zooming is smooth though and it's all internal as well. Very fast focusing lens as well and works great for tracking subjects (not all lenses can keep up with the A6000 or newer models). Edit: I've had the 18-135mm briefly as well (came with the A6400) and it's a bit more compact, has a longer range but a variable aperture as well. I personally didn't really like the out of focus rendering of that lens. But it's a lens to consider as well and many now advise on getting the 18-135mm instead of the 18-105mm. Sony a6400 Sony E 50mm F1.8 OSS Sony E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS Sigma 150-600mm F5-6.3 | C Sigma 30mm F1.4 (E/EF-M mounts) +18 more Advent1sam • Veteran Member • Posts: 9,089 Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? In reply to ChrisJ90 • Sep 5, 2019 3 ChrisJ90 wrote: 18-135! Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? In reply to ChrisJ90 • Sep 5, 2019 2 ChrisJ90 wrote: If you are taking more photos than videos, I would say go with the 18-135mm. Lighter, smaller, longer range and in my own experience, it is sharper. The zoom ring is manual so it is faster to operate than the electronic found in 18-105. The minimum focusing distance is also shorter and allows for bigger magnification than 18105. For travel photography, it is much more useful in a lot of ways. If you shoot more videos and use a gimbal, definitely goes with the 18-105mm. REDunnLev • Contributing Member • Posts: 725 Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? In reply to ChrisJ90 • Sep 5, 2019 7 I have to chime in and recommend the 18-105 f/4. The lens is as sharp as the 18-135, by most accounts, and it offers the extra stop by being a f/4. While the f/4 is only one stop, it really comes in handy in low light situations. I actually like the electronic zoom as well. Many people on this forum prefer a manual zoom but I have no issues it. It is also a fast focusing lens which makes it ideal for travel. Sony a6000 Sony a6500 Sony E 16mm F2.8 Pancake Sony E 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 OSS Sony E 30mm F3.5 Macro +9 more Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? Joe-Merlion wrote:ChrisJ90 wrote:If you are taking more photos than videos, I would say go with the 18-135mm. Lighter, smaller, longer range and in my own experience, it is sharper. The zoom ring is manual so it is faster to operate than the electronic found in 18-105. The minimum focusing distance is also shorter and allows for bigger magnification than 18105. For travel photography, it is much more useful in a lot of ways. If you shoot more videos and use a gimbal, definitely goes with the 18-105mm. I agree with this ^ and it's a pretty common opinion on this forum. But comparing primes vs. zooms is trickier. I use both, mostly because during the day when you have lots of light, the zooms are fine at f/5.6 and up. At night or indoors is where I still like to use fast primes at f/1.4 or f/1.8. So I travel with a normal zoom, a fast normal prime, and a wide angle lens. Perhaps the 18-135 and 16/1.4 can accomplish all you need, but it's tough to tell you to sell the 35 unless you don't use it. Sony a9 II Sony a7C Sony FE 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G OSS Sony FE 50mm F2.8 Macro Sony FE 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 +6 more someguy50 • Contributing Member • Posts: 504 Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? In reply to ChrisJ90 • Sep 5, 2019 5 The 18-105g is an absolutely great lens and a great value. The 18-135 is recommended as well, but I prefer the 105g for its fixed size and F4 throughout its range. Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? In reply to ChrisJ90 • Sep 5, 2019 1 I have owned the 18-105 and it is good / sharp lens. Internal zoom is a big advantage specially when hand holding and you can manually zoom if you don't like using the Power zoom button. If you are leaning towards it, go for it, don't doubt your instinct! I am not knocking down the 18-135 but initially when I store tested the two lenses on the same camera, i liked the results from the 18-105 more (natural skin tones, smoother bokeh). 18-135 is definitely more compact than 18-105 -- hide signature -- Sony A6000, A6500 16-50 OSS, Vario Tessar T*E 16-70 F4 Zeiss OSS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W610 Sony a6000 Sony a6500 Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS +2 more Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? In reply to ChrisJ90 • Sep 5, 2019 I love my 18-105. If I had to pick one lens to use with my a6500, this would be it. If I was starting from scratch again, though, it would be foolish not to consider the 18-135 - smaller and lighter, as others have pointed out - but there's something about the constant f/4 that I suspect would bring me back. Leica Q2 Sony RX100 VII Sigma sd Quattro Sigma 30mm F1.4 DC HSM Art Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM Art +2 more Advent1sam • Veteran Member • Posts: 9,089 Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? 1 REDunnLev wrote: I have to chime in and recommend the 18-105 f/4. The lens is as sharp as the 18-135, by most accounts, and it offers the extra stop by being a f/4. At 18/19 the 18-135 is faster, -1/3rd At 19-27 the 18-135 is f4, same At 27-40 the 18-135 is f4.5, +1/3rd At 40-56 the 18-135 is f5, +2/3rd 56-105, 1 stop 105-135! While the f/4 is only one stop, it really comes in handy in low light situations. see above! I actually like the electronic zoom as well. For photographers e-zoom is not ideal, as well as the power consumption, its slow, fiddly and not great. Many people on this forum prefer a manual zoom but I have no issues it. It is also a fast focusing lens which makes it ideal for travel. Advent1sam • Veteran Member • Posts: 9,089 Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? someguy50 wrote: The 18-105g is an absolutely great lens and a great value. The 18-135 is recommended as well, but I prefer the 105g for its fixed size and F4 throughout its range. https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/63068381 someguy50 • Contributing Member • Posts: 504 Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? 3 ok? Gary3000 • Senior Member • Posts: 1,550 Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? In reply to ChrisJ90 • Sep 5, 2019 1 Zoom lenses are truly great for travel. and the 18-105 is great. - especially if you shoot video and/or want the most bokeh/low light possible in that price range. the 18-135 is a great lens, and should be considered as well if you want less weight, extra reach and don't mind the higher f-stop or lack of power zoom. I have the 18-105 that I picked up a few years ago, and quite content with it. glad I didn't have to make the decision today, as both lenses have their pros and cons, and both belong in the Sony lens lineup. Sony RX100 V Canon EOS 5D Mark II Sony a6500 Canon PowerShot G12 Canon PowerShot S110 +14 more Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? In reply to ChrisJ90 • Sep 5, 2019 I've used the 18-105 quite a bit. I don't love the size, but it is deceptively lightweight. The internal zoom is nice and the constant f4 is a great feature. It's sharp enough to please me though I am not a super pixel-peeper. But even a pixel peeper would be impressed with the vast majority of the frame by the time you stop down to f5.6. The autofocus is pretty solid on the lens as well. Though it is a power zoom, you can also twist the zoom ring to zoom pretty quickly. It provides a lot of flexibility and is a very solid walkaround lens. Very good image stabilization on this lens too. I can easily shoot 1/25 at 105mm without any effort and if I am trying, I can get sharp shots at 1/10 second at 105mm. The main downsides in my view are that
The 18-135 wasn't available when I got the 18-105 so I can't weigh in on comparing the two lenses. Ricoh GR Sony E 30mm F3.5 Macro Sony E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A +1 more FunkySpoo • Senior Member • Posts: 1,529 Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? 4 Shiny Object wrote: I really like my 18-105. It's been on many vacations with me and has been great. The 18-135 wasn't around when I bought my 18-105 but I wouldn't have bought it anyway as I don't like variable F stop zooms. As far as the power zoom always resetting to 18 at start up I actually like that. At least I know where it is when I turn on the camera instead of it being where ever it was the last time I used it and have no idea which local length I used. To each his own though. Pretty sure you can't go wrong with either. Sony a7R III Lensbaby Velvet 56 Sony FE 24-105mm F4 Phase One Capture One Pro +2 more GaryW • Forum Pro • Posts: 10,077 Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? In reply to ChrisJ90 • Sep 7, 2019 1 ChrisJ90 wrote: In general, zoom lenses are not going to give you the quality of prime lenses. If you really want the highest quality zoom, you might have to go for that new $1400 Sony lens! But I did find that at f5.6, the 18-105 is very, very close to the resolution of my prime lenses (20mm/f2.8 and Sigma 30mm/f2.8). http://www.computingbits.com/photography/LensTest/testchart3.htm The 18-105 wouldn't replace all the functionality of the 35/1.8, so if you like that lens, I'd say keep it, but when out and about, I also prefer a zoom, generally. Particularly with family and they already don't want to stop while you take photos. :-/ I think the weight and size are the main negatives I have against the 18-105 for travel. I take it even for short hikes, though. But for a long trip, I might want to go lighter/more compact. By the way, look at how many people like the 18-105G. It works well. -- Gary W. Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 Sony Alpha NEX-5 Sony Alpha NEX-6 Sony a6500 +10 more Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? Shiny Object wrote: My thoughts are largely in line with this. In addition, I would also add that the zoom ring can be moved a little TOO easily. If you're not careful you can change the focal length after locking the AF, and throw off the focus a little. Although it is deceptively light, as Shiny Object states, I did find that, that weight was distributed too much towards the end of the lens, which unbalanced the feel of the overall camera/lens combo, and put a bit of pressure on the muscles in the wrist around that knobbly bit (ulna, the diagrams call it). It takes wonderful images in terms of colour, and sharpness (lacks a little depth, but it's OK), but in the end the weight distribution, size and power zoom got on my nerves. I got a Sony Zeiss 16-70mm, and have been much happier since. I'll sell the 18-105mm once I get the time. A great many other people are very happy with it though, so there's no reason to assume your experience will be the same as mine. Fujifilm X-T3 Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 Fujifilm 50mm F2 R WR Phase One Capture One Pro Apple iPhone 11 Pro taprock • New Member • Posts: 23 Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? Agreed, the power zoom is annoying for photographers. It's not fast and if you use the ring, you have to fully spin it like twice to get from 18 to 105mm. Before the 18-135 came out, the 18-105 was a much cheaper zoom alternative to the Zeiss 16-70 so it made sense. But now, I would only recommend it for video/gimbal work, or if you have very specific use case for it. Htbaa • Senior Member • Posts: 1,051 Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? In reply to taprock • Sep 7, 2019 1 taprock wrote: Agreed, the power zoom is annoying for photographers. It's not fast and if you use the ring, you have to fully spin it like twice to get from 18 to 105mm. Before the 18-135 came out, the 18-105 was a much cheaper zoom alternative to the Zeiss 16-70 so it made sense. But now, I would only recommend it for video/gimbal work, or if you have very specific use case for it. That's not true. It doesn’t take two full spins. Sony a6400 Sony E 50mm F1.8 OSS Sony E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS Sigma 150-600mm F5-6.3 | C Sigma 30mm F1.4 (E/EF-M mounts) +18 more skanter • Forum Pro • Posts: 25,975 Re: Should i get a Sony 18-105 f/4 G lens? In reply to ChrisJ90 • Sep 7, 2019 1 aChrisJ90 wrote: I love the 16-50 kit lens for travel. Small, light, and quality is fine in good light. I use the 35mm 1.8 for night shots or darker situations. Who wants to travel with big, heavy lenses? I don’t. Sony a6300 Sony a6400 Sony E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 PZ OSS +4 more Keyboard shortcuts: FForum MMy threads You may also likeLatest sample galleriesLatest in-depth reviewsThe Aura Carver 10.1" HD Digital Frame is a great way to put your portfolio on display and a great way to surface forgotten memories. The colors are vibrant, and the build quality is solid, but the Carver isn't without a few quirks. With a bigger battery and better video capabilities, the Fujifilm X-S20 could be the vlogging machine content creators have been waiting for. The Sony a7CR is a high-resolution addition to the company's compact full-frame a7C series. So what did we make of it and where does it leave the a7 IV that it sits just above? Lomography's LomoChrome '92 is designed to mimic the look of classic drugstore film that used to fill family photo albums. As we discovered, to shoot with it is to embrace the unexpected, from strange color shifts to odd textures and oversized grain. The LowePro PhotoSport Outdoor is a camera pack for photographers who also need a well-designed daypack for hiking and other outdoor use. If that sounds like you, the PhotoSport Outdoor may be a great choice, but as with any hybrid product, there are a few tradeoffs. Latest buying guidesIf you want a compact camera that produces great quality photos without the hassle of changing lenses, there are plenty of choices available for every budget. Read on to find out which portable enthusiast compacts are our favorites. What's the best camera for travel? Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best. 'What's the best mirrorless camera?' We're glad you asked. What’s the best camera for around $2000? This price point gives you access to some of the most all-round capable cameras available. Excellent image quality, powerful autofocus and great looking video are the least you can expect. We've picked the models that really stand out. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. |
