What is job in General Scale?

Construction of a job in general scale: A comparison of global, composite, and specific measures

We describe the construction of a Job in General (JIG) scale, a global scale to accompany the facet scales of the Job Descriptive Index. We applied both traditional and item response theory procedures for item analysis to data from three large heterogeneous samples (N = 1,149, 3,566, and 4,490). Alpha was .91 and above for the resulting 18-item scale in successive samples. Convergent and discriminant validity and differential response to treatments were demonstrated. Global scales are contrasted with composite and with facet scales in psychological measurement. We show that global scales are not equivalent to summated facet scales. Both facet and global scales were useful in another organization (N = 648). Some principles are suggested for choosing specific (facet), composite, or global measures for practical and theoretical problems. The correlations between global and facet scales suggest that work may be the most important facet in relation to general job satisfaction.

BGSU began development of the Job Descriptive Index (JDI) in 1942 led by the efforts of Dr. Patricia Cain Smith. Her development of the JDI and Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) are recognized as landmark contributions to the improvement of applied research and practice.

Here is what HR Magazine says:

"Amplitude Research, Inc. has launched...an online software tool that gives businesses an innovative and effective way to measure employee job satisfaction....

The nationwide benchmarking function can provide employers a clearer picture of their workforce's attitudes and pinpoint key issues and concerns that human resource managers may need to address."

@article{Ironson1989ConstructionOA,
  title={Construction of a Job in General scale: A comparison of global, composite, and specific measures.},
  author={Gail Ironson and Patricia Cain Smith and Michael T. Brannick and W. M. Gibson and Karen B. Paul},
  journal={Journal of Applied Psychology},
  year={1989},
  volume={74},
  pages={193-200}
}

We describe the construction of a Job in General (JIG) scale, a global scale to accompany the facetscales of the Job Descriptive Index. We applied both traditional and item response theory proceduresfor item analysis to data from three large heterogeneous samples (N = 1,149, 3,566, and 4,490).Alpha was .91 and above for the resulting 18-item scale in successive samples. Convergent and dis-criminant validity and differential response to treatments were demonstrated. Global scales are con-trasted… 

Tables from this paper

739 Citations

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 33 REFERENCES

Title

Construction of a Job in General Scale: A Comparison of Global, Composite, and Specific Measures

Keywords

construction & reliability & convergent & discriminant validity of global Job in General scale & correlation with Job Descriptive Index facet scales, measurement of job satisfaction, employees

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.2.193

Abstract

We describe the construction of a Job in General (JIG) scale, a global scale to accompany the facet scales of the Job Descriptive Index. We applied both traditional and item response theory procedures for item analysis to data from three large heterogeneous samples (N = 1,149, 3,566, and 4,490). Alpha was .91 and above for the resulting 18-item scale in successive samples. Convergent and discriminant validity and differential response to treatments were demonstrated. Global scales are contrasted with composite and with facet scales in psychological measurement. We show that global scales are not equivalent to summated facet scales. Both facet and global scales were useful in another organization (N = 648). Some principles are suggested for choosing specific (facet), composite, or global measures for practical and theoretical problems. The correlations between global and facet scales suggest that work may be the most important facet in relation to general job satisfaction.

Was this content written or created while at USF?

No

Citation / Publisher Attribution

Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 74, issue 2, p. 193-200

Scholar Commons Citation

Ironson, G. H.; Smith, P. C.; Brannick, M. T.; Gibson, W. M.; and Paul, K. B., "Construction of a Job in General Scale: A Comparison of Global, Composite, and Specific Measures" (1989). Psychology Faculty Publications. 2358.
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/psy_facpub/2358

DOWNLOADS

Since February 20, 2014

COinS

Who developed Job in General Scale?

Although the JIG was developed by Ironson et al. (1989) as an accompaniment to the full-length JDI, it remains in its original 18-item for- mat.

What is job satisfaction scale?

The Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS) is a questionnaire used to evaluate nine dimensions of job satisfaction related to overall satisfaction. This instrument is well established among the other job satisfaction scales.

Which of the following workplace satisfaction facets are measured by the Job Descriptive Index?

The Job Descriptive Index (JDI) is a specifically cognitive job satisfaction measure. It measures one's satisfaction in five facets: pay, promotions and promotion opportunities, coworkers, supervision, and the work itself.