What are the building blocks of social structure?

Our lives are tightly bound up in small groups. From families, friends, and peer groups, to athletic teams, voluntary associations, and work units, small groups constitute much of the fabric of our daily lives. In this chapter, we argue that small groups are important for sociologists to understand because they serve as building blocks of society, offering settings in which rudimentary forms of social structure can emerge. Small groups provide a place – usually the first place – where individuals learn to negotiate hierarchies, conform to or deviate from social norms, develop group boundaries, and where they develop and disseminate bits of culture. We organize the chapter around these five structure-producing social processes: status, power, identity, influence and social norms, and group cultures, and illustrate how these processes operate in small groups. In doing so, we illustrate the diversity of theories that have focused on small groups as the unit of anlysis. We also speculate about the reasons why sociological interest in small groups has declined over time, and suggest ways in which small groups researchers can further contribute to and play a larger role in sociology.

Keywords

  • Small groups
  • Group processes
  • Group dynamics
  • Status
  • Interaction

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter

EUR   29.95

Price includes VAT (Singapore)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32250-6_15
  • Chapter length: 28 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Buy Chapter

eBookEUR   64.19Price includes VAT (Singapore)

  • ISBN: 978-3-319-32250-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Buy eBook

Softcover BookEUR   74.99Price excludes VAT (Singapore)

  • ISBN: 978-3-319-61601-8
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Free shipping worldwide
    Shipping restrictions may apply, check to see if you are impacted.
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Buy Softcover Book

Hardcover BookEUR   159.99Price excludes VAT (Singapore)

  • ISBN: 978-3-319-32248-3
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Free shipping worldwide
    Shipping restrictions may apply, check to see if you are impacted.
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Buy Hardcover Book

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Fig. 15.1

What are the building blocks of social structure?

What are the building blocks of social structure?

Fig. 15.2

What are the building blocks of social structure?

What are the building blocks of social structure?

Notes

  1. 1.

    We thank John DeLamater and Seth Abrutyn for suggesting the “hub and spoke” metaphor.

  2. 2.

    See Burke and Stets () and Stets and Serpe () for integrated versions of the two identity theories.

References

  • Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 906–912.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (2000). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1362–1377.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009a). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 491–503.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009b). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 295–298.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 116–132.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J. S., Spataro, S. E., & Chatman, J. A. (2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1094–1110.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., Willer, R., Kilduff, G. J., & Brown, C. E. (2012). The origins of deference: When do people prefer lower status? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1077–1088.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S.E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. Groups, Leadership, and Men. pp. 222–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms. American Political Science Review, 80(04), 1095–1111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M., & Roseborough, M. E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16(4), 461–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, P. (2006). Reputational benefits for altruistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(5), 325–344.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, P., & Benard, S. (2013). Who cries wolf, and when: Manipulation of perceived threats to preserve rank in cooperative groups. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e73863.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power→ sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 768–781.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 396–403.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1951). The professional dance musician and his audience. American Journal of Sociology, 57(2), 136–144.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. The Free Press of Glencoe. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benard, S. (2012). Cohesion from conflict does intergroup conflict motivate intragroup norm enforcement and support for centralized leadership? Social Psychology Quarterly, 75(2), 107–130.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Benard, S., & Doan, L. (2011). The conflict-cohesion hypothesis: Past, present, and possible futures. Advances in Group Process, 28, 189–224.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., & Webster, M., Jr. (2006). Expectations, status, and behavior. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 268–300). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37(3), 241–255.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bienenstock, E. J., & Bonacich, P. (1992). The core as a solution to exclusionary networks. Social Networks, 14(3), 231–243.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. R., Shepard, H. A., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). Managing intergroup conflict in industry. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1(1), 3–7.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bobo, L. D. (1999). Prejudice as group position: Microfoundations of a sociological approach to racism and race relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 445–472.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bobo, L., & Hutchings, V. L. (1996). Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer’s theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61(6), 951–972.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhausen, G. V. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1(5), 319–322.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 45–62.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, R. (2005). Group size and conformity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(4), 31–354.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgois, P. (1995). In search of respect: Selling crack in El Barrio (Vol. 10). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brashears, M. E. (2008). Sex, society, and association: A cross-national examination of status construction theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 71(1), 72–85.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 56(6), 836–849.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J. (2006). Interaction in small groups. In J. DeLamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 363–387): New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., Stets, J. E., & Cerven, C. (2007). Gender, legitimation, and identity verification in groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(1), 27–42.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Calarco, J. M. (2014). The inconsistent curriculum cultural tool kits and student interpretations of ambiguous expectations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(2), 185–209.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Callero, P. L. (1985). Role-identity salience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(3), 203–215.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Centola, D., Willer, R., & Macy, M. (2005). The Emperor’s dilemma: A computational model of self‐enforcing norms. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1009–1040.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J. (2005). Can’t stop won’t stop: A history of the hip-hop generation. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 173.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B. (2009). We have to break up. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(1), 5–6.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G. (1982). Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 209–235.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., Nisbett, R. E., Bowdle, B. F., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An “experimental ethnography”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 945.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Collett, J. L., & Lizardo, O. (2014). Localizing cultural phenomena by specifying social psychological mechanisms introduction to the special issue. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(2), 95–99.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43(5), 721–739.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K., & Rice, E. R. W. (2003). Social exchange theory. In J. DeLamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 53–76). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., & Yamagishi, T. (1992). Power in exchange networks: A power-dependence formulation. Social Networks, 14(3), 245–265.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., Cheshire, C., & Gerbasi, A. (2006). Power, dependence, and social exchange. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 194–216). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, J. T. (1994). Prophecies of power: Motivational implications of social power for behavioral confirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 264.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, S. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2003). Expectation states theory. In L. De John (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 29–51). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W. A., & Eder, D. (1990). Children’s peer cultures. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 197–220.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (1956). The functions of social conflict (Vol. 9). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Quervain, D. J. F., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., & Schellhammer, M. (2004). The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science, 305(5688), 1254.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Burke, P. (2010). Bridging identities. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(4), 315–320.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, P. G., Plant, E. A., Amodio, D. M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Vance, S. L. (2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 835.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. ([1922] 2002). Human nature and conduct. Mineola, New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263–287.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dimmock, J. A., Grove, J. R., & Eklund, R. C. (2005). Reconceptualizing team identification: New dimensions and their relationship to intergroup bias. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9(2), 75–86.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. ([1894] 1988). The rules of sociological method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58(3), 154–165.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, R. C. (1994). Order without law: How neighbors settle disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, D. P. (1971). The Hobbesian problem of order: A critical appraisal of the normative solution. American Sociological Review, 36(4), 692–703.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31–41.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1964). Power-dependence relations: Two experiments. Sociometry, 27(3), 282–298.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, K. T. (1966). Wayward puritans: A study in the sociology of deviance. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fast, N. J., Halevy, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). The destructive nature of power without status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 391–394.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137–140.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. B. (1978). Aggression as impression management. Social Psychology, 41(3), 205–213.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A. (1979). Small groups and culture creation: The idioculture of little league baseball teams. American Sociological Review, 44(5), 733–745.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A. (2012). Group culture and the interaction order: Local sociology on the meso-level. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 159–179.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, R. M., & Lizardo, O. (2013). How macro-historical change shapes cultural taste legacies of democratization in Spain and Portugal. American Sociological Review, 78(2), 213–239.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, F. J. (2003). How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 539–553.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, F. J., Reagans, R. E., Amanatullah, E. T., & Ames, D. R. (2006). Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1123.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Foschi, M. (1996). Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(3), 237–254.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Foschi, M. (2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 21–42.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Foschi, M., Lai, L., & Sigerson, K. (1994). Gender and double standards in the assessment of job applicants. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(4), 326–339.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin, N. E. (1992). An expected value model of social power: Predictions for selected exchange networks. Social Networks, 14(3), 213–229.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453–466.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1068–1074.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goar, C. D. (2007). Social identity theory and the reduction of inequality: Can cross-cutting categorization reduce inequality in mixed-race groups? Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(4), 537–550.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goar, C., & Sell, J. (2005). Using task definition to modify racial inequality within task groups. The Sociological Quarterly, 46(3), 525–543.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1–17.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25(4), 483–496.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R. V. (2003). Collision of wills: How ambiguity about social rank breeds conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G., & Baldassarri, D. (2012). The impact of elections on cooperation: Evidence from a lab‐in‐the‐field experiment in Uganda. American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 964–985.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gruenfeld, D. H., Inesi, M. E., Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gürerk, Ö., Irlenbusch, B., & Rockenbach, B. (2006). The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science, 312(5770), 108–111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnate recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, B., & Fine, G. A. (2000). Opening the “black box”: Small groups and twenty-first-century sociology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 312–323.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, M. (1988). Principles of group solidarity (Vol. 11). Berkeley: Univ of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, M., & Opp, K.-D. (2001). Social norms. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, D. D. (1983). Extensions of power-dependence theory: The concept of resistance. Social Forces, 61(4), 1206–1231.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J. (2001). Cultural transmission and the diffusion of innovations: Adoption dynamics indicate that biased cultural transmission is the predominate force in behavioral change. American Anthropologist, 103(4), 992–1013.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, K. B., Arrow, H., & Carini, B. (1999). A tripartite model of group identification theory and measurement. Small Group Research, 30(5), 558–581.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, B., Thöni, C., & Gächter, S. (2008). Antisocial punishment across societies. Science, 319(5868), 1362–1367.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A. (2006). Social identity theory. Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, 13, 111–1369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255–269.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. ([1951] 1992). The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, C. (2001). Sociological perspectives on the emergence of social norms. In M. Hechter & K.-D. Opp (Eds.), Social norms (pp. 3–34). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, C. (2004). Collective benefits, exchange interests, and norm enforcement. Social Forces, 82(3), 1037–1062.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Horne, C. (2009). The rewards of punishment: A relational theory of norm enforcement. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Horne, C., & Cutlip, A. (2002). Sanctioning costs and norm enforcement an experimental test. Rationality and Society, 14(3), 285–307.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S. (1977). The three faces of social psychology. Sociometry, 40(2), 161–177.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, K., & Horne, C. (2013). A normative explanation of antisocial punishment. Social Science Research, 42(2), 562–570.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, K., Mulder, L., & Simpson, B. (2014). The detrimental effects of sanctions on intragroup trust comparing punishments and rewards. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(3), 253–272.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. W. (1993). Record. The Psychological Record, 43(3), 395–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kalkhoff, W., Younts, C. W., & Troyer, L. (2008). Facts & artifacts in research: The case of communication medium, gender, and influence. Social Science Research, 37(3), 1008–1021.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E. (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21(1), 61–78.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. R., McCarty, M. K., & Iannone, N. E. (2013). Interaction in small groups. In Handbook of social psychology (pp. 413–438). New York: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J. A., Anderson, C., & Moore, D. A. (2013). When overconfidence is revealed to others: Testing the status-enhancement theory of overconfidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 266–279.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1994). Social dilemmas. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., Scheer, L. K., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (1995). The effects of perceived interdependence on dealer attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 348–356.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kuwabara, K. (2011). Cohesion, cooperation, and the value of doing things together how economic exchange creates relational bonds. American Sociological Review, 76(4), 560–580.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J. (2002). Micro social orders. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65(1), 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1993). Power and the emergence of commitment behavior in negotiated exchange. American Sociological Review, 58(4), 465–481.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1996). Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 89–108.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1998). Network structure and emotion in exchange relations. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 871–894.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., Ford, R. S., & Blegen, M. A. (1988). Coercive capability in conflict: A test of bilateral deterrence versus conflict spiral theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 93–107.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2000). Emotion and group cohesion in productive exchange1. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3), 616–657.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2008). Social exchange and micro social order. American Sociological Review, 73(4), 519–542.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 585–634.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M., Prosser, A., Evans, D., & Reicher, S. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(4), 443–453.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, J. W. (2003). Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. American Sociological Review, 68(3), 464–480.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, J. W., & Phelan, J. C. (2012). Stigma and status the interrelation of two theoretical perspectives. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75(4), 310–333.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, J. (1987). Ain’t no makin’ it: Leveled aspirations in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maner, J. K., & Mead, N. L. (2010). The essential tension between leadership and power: When leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 482.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, N. P. (2003). Culture and competition: Homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches. American Sociological Review, 68(3), 319–345.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Markovsky, B. (1992). Network exchange outcomes: Limits of predictability. Social Networks, 14(3), 267–286.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Markovsky, B., Willer, D., & Patton, T. (1988). Power relations in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 53(2), 220–236.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, J., Abrams, D., & Serôdio, R.G. (2001). Being Better by Being Right: Subjective Group Dynamics and Derogation of In-Group Deviants When Generic Norms are Undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(3), 436–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1966). Identities and interactions. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). The study of groups: Past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 95–105.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1918). The psychology of punitive justice. The American Journal of Sociology, 23(5), 577–602.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melamed, D., & Savage, S. V. (2013). Status, numbers and influence. Social Forces, 91, 1085–1104. sos194.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1957). The role-set: Problems in sociological theory. British Journal of Sociology, 8(2), 106–120.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., Wilke, H., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, R. M., Zemke, P. E., & Lui, L. (1983). Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(2), 294.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Minescu, A., & Poppe, E. (2011). Intergroup conflict in Russia testing the group position model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74(2), 166–191.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Molm, L. D. (2010). The structure of reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molm, L. D., Collett, J. L., & Schaefer, D. R. (2007). Building solidarity through generalized exchange: A theory of reciprocity 1. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 205–242.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H. A. M., & De Cremer, D. (2005). The effect of feedback on support for a sanctioning system in a social dilemma: The difference between installing and maintaining the sanction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(3), 443–458.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the south. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, M. I., Vandello, J. A., & Darley, J. M. (2004). Casuistry and social category bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 817.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Snyder, B. H. (2009). Sociology: A lost connection in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 334–353.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, P. (1980). Rewards and punishments as selective incentives for collective action: Theoretical investigations. American Journal of Sociology, 85(6), 1356–1375.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Gardner, R. (1992). Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review, 86(02), 404–417.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Parks, C. D., & Stone, A. B. (2010). The desire to expel unselfish members from the group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 303.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, C. L., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Assimilation and differentiation needs as motivational determinants of perceived in-group and out-group homogeneity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(4), 341–348.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. (1995). Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 243.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, M. D., & Wahrman, R. (1983). Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? American Journal of Sociology, 88(4), 746–762.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (1982). Status in groups: The importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 47(1), 76–88.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (1997). Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review, 62(2), 218–235.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Status construction theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 301–323). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system a theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18(4), 510–531.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., Boyle, E. H., Kuipers, K. J., & Robinson, D. T. (1998). How do status beliefs develop? The role of resources and interactional experience. American Sociological Review, 63(3), 331–350.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., Backor, K., Li, Y. E., Tinkler, J. E., & Erickson, K. G. (2009). How easily does a social difference become a status distinction? Gender matters. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 44–62.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. T., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1992). Selective interaction as a strategy for identity maintenance: An affect control model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(1), 12–28.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rutte, C. G., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1985). Preference for decision structures in a social dilemma situation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3), 367–370.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2006). Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311(5762), 854–856.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. United States of America: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1937). An experimental approach to the study of attitudes. Sociometry, 1(1/2), 90–98.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment (Vol. 10). Norman: University Book Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibutani, T. (1978). The derelicts of Company K: A sociological study of demoralization. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1898). The persistence of social groups. The American Journal of Sociology, 3(5), 662–698.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. ([1908] 1955). Conflict and the web of group affiliations (trans: Wolff, K., & Bendix, R.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. ([1908] 1971). Georg Simmel on individuality and social forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, B., & Macy, M. W. (2001). Collective action and power inequality: Coalitions in exchange networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(1), 88–100.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, L., & Kunda, Z. (2000). Motivated stereotyping of women: She’s fine if she praised me but incompetent if she criticized me. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1329–1342.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin, L., & Brody, C. (1989). Interruptions in group discussions: The effects of gender and group composition. American Sociological Review, 54(3), 424–435.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., Schmeeckle, M., & Felmlee, D. (2006). The principle of least interest inequality in emotional involvement in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 27(9), 1255–1280.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A. A. (1976). Conflict and cohesion a review of the literature. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 20(1), 143–172.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, I. D. (1974). Whatever happened to the group in social psychology? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10(1), 94–108.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Serpe, R. T. (2013). Identity theory. New York: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Strang, D., & Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265–290.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Strodtbeck, F. L., James, R. M., & Hawkins, C. (1957). Social status in jury deliberations. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 713–719.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Struch, N., & Schwartz, S. H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 364.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural approach. Menlo Park: Benjamin & Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (2008). From mead to a structural symbolic interactionism and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 15–31.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways: A study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores, and morals. Boston: Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33(47), 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 73–98). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tavory, I. (2010). Of yarmulkes and categories: Delegating boundaries and the phenomenology of interactional expectation. Theory and Society, 39(1), 49–68.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., Breaux, D. M., Geider, S., Hu, C., & Hua, W. (2009). Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 156–167.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (1983). Multiple identities and psychological well-being: A reformulation and test of the social isolation hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 174–187.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (1986). Multiple identities: Examining gender and marital status differences in distress. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 259–272.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (1992). Identity structures and psychological well-being: Gender and marital status comparisons. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(3), 236–256.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (1995). Social psychology: The interplay between sociology and psychology. Social Forces, 73(4), 1231–1243.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (2003). Personal agency in the accumulation of multiple role-identities. In Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 179–194). New York: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2), 145–161.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (2012). Role-identity salience, purpose and meaning in life, and well-being among volunteers. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75(4), 360–384.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas-Hunt, M. C., & Phillips, K. W. (2004). When what you know is not enough: Expertise and gender dynamics in task groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(12), 1585–1598.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thye, S. R. (2000). A status value theory of power in exchange relations. American Sociological Review, 65(3), 407–432.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research from grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vaisey, S. (2009). Motivation and justification: A dual‐process model of culture in action 1. American Journal of Sociology, 114(6), 1675–1715.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. J. (1999). Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon 1. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 493–527.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M., Jr., & Driskell, J. E., Jr. (1983). Beauty as status. American Journal of Sociology, 89(1), 140–165.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M., Jr., Hysom, S. J., & Fullmer, E. M. (1998). Sexual orientation and occupation as status. Advances in Group Processes, 15, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenneras, C., & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature 387, 341–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willer, D. (1992). Predicting power in exchange networks: A brief history and introduction to the issues. Social Networks, 14(3), 187–211.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Willer, R. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 23–43.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Willer, R., Kuwabara, K., & Macy, M. W. (2009). The false enforcement of unpopular norms 1. American Journal of Sociology, 115(2), 451–490.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Willer, R., Youngreen, R., Troyer, L., & Lovaglia, M. J. (2012). How do the powerful attain status? The roots of legitimate power inequalities. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33(5–6), 355–367.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Willer, R., Rogalin, C. L., Conlon, B., & Wojnowicz, M. T. (2013). Overdoing gender: A test of the masculine overcompensation thesis. American Journal of Sociology, 118(4), 980–1022.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 323.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wrong, D. H. (1961). The oversocialized conception of man in modern sociology. American Sociological Review, 26(2), 183–193.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 110.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. (1988a). The provision of a sanctioning system in the United States and Japan. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(3), 265–271.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. (1988b). Seriousness of social dilemmas and the provision of a sanctioning system. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(1), 32–42.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., & Kiyonari, T. (1999). Bounded generalized reciprocity: Ingroup boasting and ingroup favoritism. Advances in Group Processes, 16(1), 161–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, J., Thye, S. R., & Lawler, E. J. (2013). Exchange and cohesion in dyads and triads: A test of Simmel’s hypothesis. Social Science Research, 42(6), 1457–1466.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch, M. (2001). Processes of legitimation: Recent developments and new directions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(1), 4–17.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, C., Magee, J. C., Maddux, W. W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, culture, and action: Considerations in the expression and enactment of power in East Asian and Western societies. Research on Managing in Teams and Groups, 9, 53–73.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Stephen Benard & Trenton D. Mize

Authors

  1. Stephen Benard

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Trenton D. Mize

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Benard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA

    Seth Abrutyn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benard, S., Mize, T.D. (2016). Small Groups: Reflections of and Building Blocks for Social Structure. In: Abrutyn, S. (eds) Handbook of Contemporary Sociological Theory. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32250-6_15

What are the 3 components of social structure?

Norms, roles, and institutions are all components of the social structure on different levels of complexity.

What are the 4 components of social structure?

The major components of social structure include culture, social class, social status, roles, groups, and social institutions.

What are the building blocks of culture in society?

The major elements of culture are symbols, language, norms, values, and artifacts. Language makes effective social interaction possible and influences how people conceive of concepts and objects. Major values that distinguish the United States include individualism, competition, and a commitment to the work ethic.

What are social blocks?

When you block someone on social media, you prevent them from seeing your posts on that social network. Blocked users will also be unable to follow you, message you, or tag you in photos.