Which philosophical theory of psychology is most influential in the study of sensation and perception?
ReferencesAdrian, E. D., & Zotterman, Y. (1926a). The impulses produced by sensory nerve endings. Part II. The response of a single end-organ. Journal of Physiology, 61, 151–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Show Adrian, E. D., & Zotterman, Y. (1926b). The impulses produced by sensory nerve endings. Part 3. Impulses set up by touch and pressure. Journal of Physiology, 61, 465–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Aitken, R. C. B. (1969). Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 62, 989–993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Bartoshuk, L. M. (1978). History of taste research. In Carterette, E. C. & Friedman, M. P. (Eds.), Handbook of Perception (Vol. 6A, pp. 3–18). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Bartoshuk, L. M. (1993a). The biological basis of food perception and acceptance. Food Quality and Preference, 4, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Bartoshuk, L. M. (Ed.) (1993b). Genetic and Pathological Taste Variation: What Can We Learn from Animal Models and Human Disease? (Vol. Ciba Foundation Symposium 179). New York: Wiley.Google ScholarPubMed Bartoshuk, L. M., Duffy, V. B., Chapo, A. K., Fast, K., Yiee, J. H., Hoffman, H. J., Ko, C.-W., & Snyder, D. J. (2004). From psychophysics to the clinic: missteps and advances. Food Quality and Preference, 15, 617–632.Google Scholar Bartoshuk, L. M., Duffy, V. B., Fast, K., Green, B. G., Prutkin, J. M., & Snyder, D. J. (2002). Labeled scales (e.g., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: What we have learned from genetic variation in taste. Food Quality and Preference, 14, 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Bartoshuk, L. M., Duffy, V. B., Green, B. G., Hoffman, H. J., Ko, C.-W., Lucchina, L. A., Marks, L. E., Snyder, D. J., & Weiffenbach, J. (2004). Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: The gLMS vs. magnitude matching. Physiology & Behavior, 82, 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Bartoshuk, L. M., Harned, M. A., & Parks, L. H. (1971). Taste of water in the cat: Effects on sucrose preference. Science, 171, 699–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Bartoshuk, L. M., McBurney, D. H., & Pfaffmann, C. (1964). Taste of sodium chloride solutions after adaptation to sodium chloride: Implications of the “water taste.” Science, 143, 967–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Beare, J. I. (1906). Greek Theories of Elementary Cognition from Alemaeon to Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar Beebe-Center, J. G. (1932). The Psychology of Pleasantness and Unpleasantness. New York: D. Van Nostrand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Benjamin, L. T. (1977). The Psychological Round Table: Revolution of 1936. American Psychologist, 32, 542–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Bentham, J. (1876). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar Berkowitz, C. (2014). Defining a discovery: Priority and methodological controversy in early nineteenth-century anatomy. Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science, 68, 357–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Biernat, M., & Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Birnbaum, M. H. (1999). How to show that 9 > 221: Collect judgements in a between-subjects design. Psychological Methods, 4, 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Bolles, R. C. (1991). Hedonism. In Bolles, R. C. (Ed.), The Hedonics of Taste (pp. 1–13). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar Boring, E. G. (1929). A History of Experimental Psychology. New York: Century.Google Scholar Boring, E. G. (1942). Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar Brock, W. H. (1967). William Prout on taste, smell, and flavor. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 22, 184–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Cohen, H. (1965). Opening address of the innaugural meeting. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58, 659–663.Google Scholar Dember, W. N. (1990). William James on sensation and perception. Psychological Science, 1, 163–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Engen, T. (1982). The Perception of Odors. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar Faruque, M. U. (1981). The internal senses in Nemesius, Plotinus and Galen: The beginning of an idea. Journal of Ancient Philosophy, 10, 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar Fernberger, S. W. (1914). Note on the affective values of colors. American Journal of Psychology, 25, 448–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Frank, M. (1973). An analysis of hamster afferent taste nerve response functions. Journal of General Physiology, 61, 588–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Green, B. G. (1977). Localization of thermal sensation: An illusion and synthetic heat. Perception and Psychophysics, 22, 331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Green, B. G., Shaffer, G. S., & Gilmore, M. M. (1993). A semantically-labeled magnitude scale of oral sensation with apparent ratio properties. Chemical Senses, 18, 683–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Hänig, D. P. (1901). Zur Psychophysik des Geschmackssinnes. Philosophische Studien, 17, 576–623.Google Scholar Hetherington, M. M., & Rolls, B. J. (1987). Methods of investigating human eating behavior. In Toates, F. M. & Rowland, N. E. (Eds.), Feeding and Drinking (pp. 77–109). New York: Elsevier Science Publishers (Biomedical Division).Google Scholar Hoon, M. A., Adler, E., Lindemeier, J., Battey, J. F., Ryba, N. J. P., & Zuker, C. S. (1999). Putative mammalian taste receptors: A class of taste-specific GPCRs with distinct topographic selectivity. Cell, 96, 541–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Hurvich, L. M., & Jameson, D. (1957). An opponent-process theory of color vision. Psychological Review, 64, 384–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Jeon, T.-I., Zhu, B., Larson, J. L., & Osborne, T. F. (2008). SREBP-2 regulates gut peptide secretion through intestinal bitter taste receptor signaling in mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 118, 3693–3700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Johnson, G. (2005). Miss Leavitt’s Stars: The Untold Story of the Woman Who Discovered How to Measure the Universe. New York: Norton.Google Scholar Johnson, J. P. (2011). Animal electricity, circa 1781. Scientist Magazine, September 28. Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., Jessell, T. M., Siegelbaum, S. A., & Hudspeth, A. J. (2013). Principles of Neural Science. New York: McGraw Medical.Google Scholar Klatzky, R. L. (2018). Touch. In Wolfe, J. M., Kluender, K. R., & Levi, D. M. (Eds.), Sensation & Perception. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar Knuuttila, S. & Kärkkäinen, P. (2014). Medieval theories of internal senses. In Knuuttila, S. & Sihvola, J. (Eds.), Sourcebook for the History of the Philosophy of Mind (pp 131–145). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Krebs, E. E., Carey, T. S., & Weinberger, M. (2007). Accuracy of the pain numeric rating scale as a screening test in primary care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 453–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Lasagna, L. (1960). The clinical measurement of pain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 86, 28–37.Google Scholar Lloyd, G. E. R. (1970). Early Greek Science Thales to Aristotle. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar Meiselman, H. L., & Schutz, H. G. (2003). History of food acceptance research in the US Army. Appetite, 40, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Melzack, R. (1983). The McGill Pain Questionnaire. In Melzack, R. (Ed.), Pain Measurement and Assessment (pp. 41–47), New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar Nafe, J. P. (1929). A quantitative theory of feeling. Journal of General Physiology, 2, 199–211.Google Scholar Narens, L., & Luce, R. D. (1983). How we may have been misled into believing in the interpersonal comparability of utility. Theory and Decision, 15, 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Peryam, D. R., & Pilgrim, F. J. (1957). Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technology, 11, 9–14.Google Scholar Pfaffmann, C. (1941). Gustatory afferent impulses. Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology, 17, 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Pfaffmann, C. (1974a). de Gustibus (Mark II). In Krawiec, T. S. (Ed.), The Psychologists (pp. 402–439). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar Pfaffmann, C. (1974b). Specificity of the sweet receptors of the squirrel monkey. Chemical Senses and Flavor, 1, 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, D. D., McGrath, P. A., Rafii, A., & Buckingham, B. (1983). The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain, 17, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed [Prout, W.] (1812). Observations upon the sensations of taste and smell. Medical and Physical Journal, 22, 457–461.Google Scholar Ramachandran, V. S., & Rogers-Ramachandran, D. (2008). Touching illusions: Startling deceptions demonstrate how tactile information is processed in the brain. Scientific American, 18, 60–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Reid, T. (1785). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Edinburgh: Ogle, Allardice and Thomson.Google Scholar Silverstone, T., & Stunkard, A. J. (1968). The anorectic effect of dexamphetamine sulphate. British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, 33, 513–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Spence, D. P., & Ehrenberg, B. (1964). Effects of oral deprivation on responses to subliminal and supraliminal verbal food stimuli. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 10–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Stevens, J. C., & Green, B. G. (1996). History of research on touch. In Kruger, L. (Ed.), Pain and Touch (pp. 1–23). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar Stevens, S. S. (1955). The measurement of loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 815–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Stevens, S. S. (1974). S. S. Stevens. In Lindzey, G. (Ed.), A History of Psychology in Autobiography (Vol. 6, pp. 393–420). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar Stratton, G. M. (1917). Theophrastus and the Greek Physiological Psychology Before Aristotle. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar Tinazzi, M., Marotta, A., Fasano, A., Bove, F., Bentivoglio, A. R., Squintani, G., Pozzer, L., & Florio, M. (2013). Aristotle’s illusion reveals interdigit functional somatosensory alterations in focal hand dystonia. Brain, 136, 782–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Titchener, E. B. (1896). An Outline of Psychology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar Von Staden, H. (1992). The discovery of the body: Human dissection and its cultural contexts in ancient Greece. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 65, 223–241.Google ScholarPubMed Vosshall, L. B. (2015). Laying a controversial smell theory to rest. PNAS, 112, 6525–6526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Weiss, T., Snitz, K., Yablonka, A., Khan, R. M., Gafsou, D., Schneidman, E., & Sobel, N. (2012). Perceptual convergence of multi-component mixtures in olfaction implies an olfactory white. PNAS, 109, 19959–19964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Westheimer, G. (1983). Hermann Helmholtz and origins of sensory physiology. Trends in Neuroscience, 6, 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Wolfe, J., Kluender, K. R., & Levi, D. M. (Eds.). (2018). Sensation & Perception. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar Wundt, W. (1897). Outlines of Psychology. Translated by Judd, C. H.. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Young, P. T. (1959). The role of affective processes in learning and motivation. Psychological Review, 66, 104–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Which group of psychologists were interested in the study of perception?Cognitive psychologists study how people perceive, process, and remember information.
What is the most popular psychology theory?List of popular theories of psychology: 1. Piaget Theory of Development 2. Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development 3.. Piaget Theory of Development: ... . Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development: ... . Spearman's Two-Factor Theory:. What was William James functionalism theory of psychology?Functionalism is concerned with explaining the function or purpose of certain forms of behavior, namely that of consciousness or our internal mental states. This theoretical perspective on psychology sought causal relationships between internal states (such as being happy) and external behaviors (such as laughter).
Who do you think is the most influential figure in the history of psychology?Freud and Psychoanalytic Theory
Perhaps one of the most influential and well-known figures in psychology's history was Sigmund Freud (see Figure 4). Freud (1856–1939) was an Austrian neurologist who was fascinated by patients suffering from “hysteria” and neurosis.
|