Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G on one side and the MediaTek Helio G95 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.4GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors [if indicated], the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | MediaTek Helio G95 | ||||||
| Market [main] | Smartphone | Smartphone | ||||||
| ISA | ARMv8-A [64-bit] | ARMv8.2-A [64-bit] | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Cortex-A73, Cortex-A53 | Cortex-A76, Cortex-A55 | ||||||
| Core name | Kryo 265 Gold, Kryo 265 Silver | Cortex-A76, Cortex-A55 | ||||||
| Family | Snapdragon 600 | Helio G | ||||||
| Part number[s], S-Spec | SM6225 | Helio G95 | ||||||
| Release date | Q4 2021 | Q3 2020 | ||||||
| Lithography | 6 nm N6 | 12 nm FFC | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 2.4 GHz | - | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x Qualcomm Kryo 265 Silver @ 1.8 GHz | 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.05 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores | 4x Qualcomm Kryo 265 Gold @ 2.4 GHz | 2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.05 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 1 MB | 2 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 12 GB | 8 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | LPDDR4X-2133 | LPDDR4x-2133 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| TDP | 6 W | 5 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | ARM Mali-G76 MC4 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 96 | 64 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | - | 900 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 600 MHz | 900 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 115.2 GFLOPS | 195.8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | SoC | SoC | ||||||
| DSP | Qualcomm Hexagon 686 | - | ||||||
| DSP computing operations per seconds | 3.3 TOPS | - | ||||||
| ISP | Qualcomm Spectra 346 | - | ||||||
| Max display resolution | 1080 x 2520 @ 90 Hz | - | ||||||
| Video decoding | H.265, H.264 1080p@60fps | - | ||||||
| Max camera ISP | 64 MP; 16 MP + 16 MP | - | ||||||
| Cellular technologies | LTE, WCDMA, CDMA, EVDO, GSM, EDGE | - | ||||||
| GNSS | Beidou, Galileo, GLONASS, NavIC, GPS, QZSS | - | ||||||
| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X11 LTE | - | ||||||
| LTE download speed | Up to 390 Mbit/s | - | ||||||
| LTE upload speed | Up to 150 Mbit/s | - | ||||||
| LTE category | Cat 13 | - | ||||||
| Connectivity | USB-C | - | ||||||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | - | ||||||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 | - | ||||||
| Audio | Qualcomm WCD9385 | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 216,841 | 294,550 | ||||||
| [Android] PassMark CPU Mark | 3,511 | 3,014 | ||||||
| [Android 64-bit] Geekbench 4 single core | 1,835 | 2,449 | ||||||
| [Android 64-bit] Geekbench 4 multi-core | 6,291 | 6,655 | ||||||
| [Android] Geekbench 5 single core | 380 | 513 | ||||||
| [Android] Geekbench 5 multi-core | 1,532 | 1,640 | ||||||
| [SGEMM] GFLOPS performance | 45 GFLOPS | 65.7 GFLOPS | ||||||
| [Multi-core / watt performance] Performance / watt ratio | 1,049 pts / W | 1,331 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of MediaTek Helio G95 is less. The Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| MediaTek Helio G95 | 294,550 |
| Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | 216,841 |
The difference is 36%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | 3,511 |
| MediaTek Helio G95 | 3,014 |
The difference in performance is 16%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android 64-bit:
| MediaTek Helio G95 | 2,449 6,655 |
| Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | 1,835 6,291 |
In single core, the difference is 33%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 6%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| MediaTek Helio G95 | 513 1,640 |
| Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | 380 1,532 |
In single core, the difference is 35%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 7%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G Intel equivalentQualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G AMD equivalentMediaTek Helio G95 Intel equivalentMediaTek Helio G95 AMD equivalent
See also:
MediaTek Helio G99
Smartphones with the processor Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G:
Honor X7Honor X8Huawei Nova 9 SEHuawei Nova Y90Motorola Moto G32Motorola Moto G42Motorola Moto G52Oppo A36Oppo A76Oppo A96Oppo K10Oppo Reno7Realme 9Realme 9iSamsung Galaxy A23Vivo iQOO Z6 44WVivo T1X 4GXiaomi Redmi 10CXiaomi Redmi 10C NFC
Smartphones with the processor MediaTek Helio G95:
Infinix Note 10 ProInfinix Zero XInfinix Zero X NeoInfinix Zero X ProMotorola Moto G60sOukitel WP17Oukitel WP19Realme 7Realme 8Realme Narzo 20 ProRealme Narzo 30Tecno Camon 17 ProTecno Phantom XUlefone Power Armor 13Umidigi Bison GTUmidigi Bison GT2Umidigi Bison GT2 ProVivo Y73Xiaomi Poco M5sXiaomi Redmi Note 10S