So sánh intel hd graphics 630 năm 2024
|
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Show
Pipelines / CUDA cores2424Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHzBoost clock speed1150 MHz950 MHzNumber of transistors189 million1,300 millionManufacturing process technology14 nm14 nmPower consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 WattTexture fill rate26.4022.80Floating-point performance441.6 gflopsno data Size and compatibilityInformation on HD Graphics 630 and HD Graphics 5500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x1WidthIGPno data MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4System SharedMaximum RAM amount64 GBSystem SharedMemory bus width64/128 Bit64/128 BitMemory clock speedSystem SharedSystem SharedShared memory++ Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)Shader Model6.45.1OpenGL4.64.4OpenCL2.12.0Vulkan+1.1.80 Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. HD Graphics 630 3.08 +105% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 5500 by 105% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% HD Graphics 630 1197 +106% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 5500 by 106% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% HD Graphics 630 7685 +60.2% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 5500 by 60% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% HD Graphics 630 1729 +76.6% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 5500 by 77% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% HD Graphics 630 1067 +60.9% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 5500 by 61% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% HD Graphics 630 9715 +75.2% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 5500 by 75% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. 3DMark Ice Storm GPUIce Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% HD Graphics 630 101178 +72.1% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 5500 by 72% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU. Unigine Heaven 3.0This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine. Benchmark coverage: 4% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 5500 by 102% in Unigine Heaven 3.0. Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: 900p24−27 +84.6% 13 −84.6% Full HD15 +50% 10 −50% 1440p64 +113% 30−35 −113% 4K13 +117% 6−7 −117% Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 20776−7 4−5 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey5 0−1 Battlefield 57−8 0−1 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14 +30% 10−11 −30% Cyberpunk 20776−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Far Cry 56 +200% 2−3 −200% Far Cry New Dawn5 +150% 2−3 −150% Forza Horizon 410−11 +150% 4−5 −150% Hitman 36−7 +500% 1−2 −500% Horizon Zero Dawn4−5 +300% 1−2 −300% Red Dead Redemption 26−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Shadow of the Tomb Raider5 −40% 7−8 +40% Watch Dogs: Legion1−2 0−1 Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey4−5 0−1 Battlefield 57−8 0−1 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14 +30% 10−11 −30% Cyberpunk 20776−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Far Cry 55−6 +150% 2−3 −150% Far Cry New Dawn5−6 +150% 2−3 −150% Forza Horizon 410−11 +150% 4−5 −150% Hitman 36−7 +500% 1−2 −500% Horizon Zero Dawn4−5 +300% 1−2 −300% Metro Exodus2 +0% 2−3 +0% Red Dead Redemption 26−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Shadow of the Tomb Raider9−10 +28.6% 7−8 −28.6% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt7−8 +75% 4 −75% Watch Dogs: Legion1−2 0−1 Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey4−5 0−1 Battlefield 57−8 0−1 Cyberpunk 20776−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Far Cry 55−6 +150% 2−3 −150% Far Cry New Dawn5−6 +150% 2−3 −150% Forza Horizon 410−11 +150% 4−5 −150% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt7−8 +250% 2 −250% Watch Dogs: Legion1−2 0−1 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare5−6 +25% 4−5 −25% Hitman 36−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Horizon Zero Dawn8−9 +14.3% 7−8 −14.3% Metro Exodus1−2 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 21−2 0−1 Shadow of the Tomb Raider5−6 +25% 4−5 −25% 1440p Ultra Preset Cyberpunk 20772−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Far Cry 54−5 +100% 2−3 −100% Forza Horizon 43−4 +200% 1−2 −200% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt1−2 0−1 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare2−3 +0% 2−3 +0% Hitman 33−4 +50% 2−3 −50% Horizon Zero Dawn6−7 +0% 6−7 +0% Red Dead Redemption 21−2 0−1 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey0−1 0−1 Cyberpunk 20770−1 0−1 Far Cry 54−5 +33.3% 3−4 −33.3% Far Cry New Dawn6−7 +20% 5−6 −20% Forza Horizon 43−4 +200% 1−2 −200% This is how HD Graphics 630 and HD Graphics 5500 compete in popular games: 900p resolution:
1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 3.08 1.50 Recency 1 January 2017 5 January 2015 Maximum RAM amount 64 GB System Shared The HD Graphics 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 5500 in performance tests. Be aware that HD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while HD Graphics 5500 is a notebook one. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 5500 Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate Intel HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate Intel HD Graphics 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
