The Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation considers appellate and Supreme Court Nominees by

In addition to its critical role in providing oversight of the Department of Justice and the agencies under the Department's jurisdiction, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Department of Homeland Security, the Judiciary Committee plays an important role in the consideration of nominations and pending legislation.

Executive nominations for positions in the Department of Justice, Office of National Drug Control Policy, the United States Parole Commission, the United States Sentencing Commission, and the State Justice Institute, as well as select nominations for the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Commerce are referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The Judiciary Committee is also charged with the consideration of all Article III judicial nominations.  These include Supreme Court nominations, appellate court nominations, and district court nominations.  The Committee also considers nominations to the Court of International Trade.

In addition to its role in conducting oversight and consideration of nominations, the Senate Judiciary Committee also considers legislation, resolutions, messages, petitions, memorials and other matters, as provided for in the Standing Rules of the Senate.  These areas include:

  • Apportionment of Representatives
  • Bankruptcy, mutiny, espionage, and counterfeiting
  • Civil liberties
  • Constitutional amendments
  • Federal courts and judges
  • Government information
  • Holidays and celebrations
  • Immigration and naturalization
  • Interstate compacts generally
  • Judicial proceedings, civil and criminal, generally
  • Local courts in territories and possessions
  • Measures relating to claims against the United States
  • National penitentiaries
  • Patent Office
  • Patents, copyrights, and trademarks
  • Protection of trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies
  • Revision and codification of the statutes of the United States
  • State and territorial boundary lines

Politics

Updated on: August 26, 2022 / 1:40 PM / AP

PIX Now

PIX Now 10:42

SACRAMENTO — California voters will consider Patricia Guerrero to become the state Supreme Court's 29th chief justice in November after the state's Commission on Judicial Appointments on Friday approved her nomination.

Gov. Gavin Newsom picked Guerrero to be the first Latina to serve as California's chief justice, after naming her to the court in February as an associate justice. She joined the seven-member high court a month later after previously serving as a state appellate judge since 2017.

If voters agree, she will replace Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, who is retiring in January.

"Black and Brown, students and lawyers, women and other minorities will see in her someone they can emulate as a role model," Associate Justice Martin Jenkins, the court's first openly gay Black man, said in backing her confirmation.

Jenkins added: "But the story of her journey from Imperial Valley to this courtroom today is a story that we can all draw inspiration from, irrespective of race, ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation."

The Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation of the State Bar of California rated Guerrero "exceptionally well qualified," reflecting that the commission believes she has skills of "remarkable or extraordinary superiority."

"I think this vote is pre-ordained," said Cantil-Sakauye at the end of what she described as a "joyous hearing" in which she, Attorney General Rob Bonta and the most senior presiding justice of the state appellate courts, Manuel Ramirez, confirmed Guerrero by a voice vote.

Bonta called her story of growing up the daughter of a Mexican immigrant farmworker and learning English as a second language "really the embodiment of the California dream."

Supporters praised Guerrero throughout the hearing, which became a 70-minute celebration not only of her nomination and of Cantil-Sakauye's 12 years oversight of the court.

Guerrero was repeatedly described as a consensus builder, a significant attribute in managing a high court that prides itself on its collegiality in contrast to the infighting and distrust that has recently marked the U.S. Supreme Court.

Guerrero will face no competition on the November ballot.

Unlike U.S. Supreme Court justices and federal judges, California judges do not hold lifetime positions, but serve 12-year terms.

Voters in November will also decide whether to retain three associate justices. California voters simply vote "yes" or "no" on retaining justices in office. The justices do not run against other candidates.

    In:
  • California Supreme Court

Thanks for reading CBS NEWS.

Create your free account or log in
for more features.

Please enter email address to continue

Please enter valid email address to continue